The core here refers to the policy background, the market trend before and after, and the actions of the national team when three times of high opening and low going appeared. In particular, the support action of the national team will have a great impact on the short-term trend of the whole market. This is because funds can determine the short-term trend of the market to a greater extent, while fundamentals can determine the medium-and long-term trend of the market to a greater extent.First, compared with any other funds, the national team is more familiar with the macro-adjustment strategy of the top level, and enters the market accurately before the Politburo meeting, mostly knowing that there will be great benefits at the meeting. Therefore, entering the venue last Friday can avoid chasing after the meeting, which has a greater cost advantage!Let's take a look at the trends of insurance, brokerage and real estate yesterday. These three directions were the main force that drove the market to break through last Friday. Yesterday, all three sectors opened higher and went lower. Today, brokers and real estate quickly stopped falling, keeping the market from falling further. So who's on the pressure plate, you don't have to tell me.
These days, Junge's review articles mainly focus on the market, and rarely mention the changes in the pattern of various parts of the market. This is because the recent hot spots in the main market are very clear, namely artificial intelligence and robots. In addition to these two main lines, there are several small hot spots that are difficult to become main lines around, that is, cultivating diamond and millet economy.Then why is this trend happening? Many investors may think that yesterday's A shares opened higher and went lower under the favorable stimulus of the Politburo meeting, which is very similar to last year's 828 market and the trend on October 8 this year. But in your brother's view, these three false yin lines are just similar in shape, but the cores are not the same.What does this mean? To put it simply, when the market opened sharply higher yesterday, the main institutions were unwilling to chase after it, so the decrease in buying was very obvious. However, the selling of institutional seats was basically the same as that on Monday. This shows that the main institutions did not deliberately borrow good shipments yesterday. In terms of hot money, it was still a net inflow yesterday.
Yesterday, both the A-share market and the Growth Enterprise Market index opened sharply higher and went lower, which was very ugly. After the A-share market closed, the decline of Hong Kong stocks expanded. Last night, the FTSE A50 and Nasdaq China Jinlong Index both showed obvious corrections, and the China Jinlong Index fell by more than 4%!The core here refers to the policy background, the market trend before and after, and the actions of the national team when three times of high opening and low going appeared. In particular, the support action of the national team will have a great impact on the short-term trend of the whole market. This is because funds can determine the short-term trend of the market to a greater extent, while fundamentals can determine the medium-and long-term trend of the market to a greater extent.If institutions and hot money are not the main force of yesterday's smashing, how did yesterday's high opening and low walking form?
Strategy guide
12-13
Strategy guide
12-13
Strategy guide 12-13
Strategy guide 12-13